The Axis keyboards from C-Thru music are potentially the most keyboard innovative instrument to come out in several centuries (8 to be exact), for reasons discussed elsewhere on this site. No one else has the magical combination of velocity-sensitive, 2-dimensional array, ergonomic, isomorphic and inexpensive keys this thing has.
My gang of DIY music keeners (a.k.a. totally nuts music nerds) really wanted to see the inside of the new Axis-49. I volunteered to be the fall-guy. So here is what I found.
1. Cute Feet.
The bottom of the unit has rubber feet that can be put in several places,
to stick out to a different degree and thus change the unit's tilt. This is a simple, robust way to adjust tilt that I wish PC keyboards had, as the hinge system many of them use is prone to collapse.
2. Clean PCB design.
3. 2 Chips to run it all.
The whole thing is driven with only 2 chips, the USB interface is a PIC18LF2450-I/SO, and the dsp chip is a dsPIC33FJ128 GP310-I/PT, a nice 16-bit, 40-MPS Microchip chip. Both chips are quality chips, and relatively expensive, I believe.
4. Inexpensive quality.The buttons (technically membrane switches) are like the Yamaha DSP that I took apart a year or two ago. But these oft-maligned switches are much better, with real disks of graphite, and gold, not copper contacts. The thick membrane is probably high-quality silicone, which does not degrade with time. The throw is a decent 1 mm. not the .05 as in the Yamaha toy. I'm impressed. These should last many years and should always be accurate.
5. Possible Key customization.
Finally, here are the key-posts. I do not recommend that you pull them off - you may not get them fully back on the fastener, and may hurt the switch underneath. Instead disassemble the unit to get at the keys.
Note that you should take great care in taking the top of the PCB. Turn the unit on edge, with the USB jack port on the bottom edge. Take your time.
Put the unit back together the same way, and ensure the membranes go all back exactly into place.
It should be possible to put in a light spring, felt washer or some such to quiet the keys, too.
6. A modest Mod.
I re-arranged and partly recolored one bank of keys for playing in Wicki (folded major scale) mode. C in Green, E is dark blue.
In summary, this is technically a very well built instrument.
Update - The AXiS-49 music controller is in my hands and works! Let the evaluation begin!
Alas, I have missed the chance to evaluate last week, when I had time off. Now I'm cramming the review in between rehearsals, now I get to look at it and not play. I
From dreary slogging to ...
I once heard heard Dan Bricklin speak about one of the first demos he gave of his newly packaged VisiCalc. A businessman was there, a very well-dressed senior accountant or high-level financial advisor. After Dan gave his talk, the gentleman had a cheque ready, and the cost of the Apple computer and Dan's software was obviously not an issue. What impressed Dan, however, was that as the cheque was handed over, the man's hand shook.
Dan talked to him and discovered the man was just beside himself hoping, praying that his new spreadsheet - that Dan really saw as just a nifty new programming language and tool - would transform his job from dreary daily slogging into an satisfying adventure. And damn, the gentleman was right! For a number-cruncher, spreadsheets are like breathing; wonderful when you consider the alternative.
Similarly, I believe there is an most excellent chance that a similar transformation is possible here. I have strong reasons to expect that the hexagonal-layout, velocity sensitive music keyboard is as great an improvement over the traditional keyboard as the first harpsichord was over the harp, a thousand years ago.
Of course, there are many things that could still be inadvertently "wrong" with the AXiS-49 for my purposes. Keyboard design is a fine, fine art, as I know well to my personal expense. For this reason, I will be not placing any bets until it is in my fingers and properly evalutated.Let me know what you want evaluated.
Ken Rushton, Email: MusicScienceGuy (at) shaw.ca
Years ago, Dr. Issac Asimov was such a wonderful writer that he could explain anything so that it made perfect sense. Slide-rules, cholesterol, neutrinos, all were gist for his typewriter. In one memorable essay, "Music to my ears" he explained the design of the major scale so well that I still remember the principles 40 years after reading it. This posting is dedicated to the good doctor.
The tonic and the upper tonic, plucked together sound smooth & consonant, yet different . Further, plucking just one makes the other string vibrate, unless muted by a finger, courtesy of the vibrations transmitted through the soundboard. You suddenly have variety: the number of possible sounds has leapt. From a toy, an instrument has emerged.
-
And relativity still reigns. If there is above the tonic a note that is dominant to it, there must be a note below the tonic such that the tonic is dominant to. Call this the Subdominant. It lives up to it's name, sounding and feeling somewhat over-topped by the tonic. It is exactly is 2/3 the pitch of the tonic (2/3 * 3/2 = 1).
Filling in the dominant of the lower-Tonic (3/4 of the Tonic), and the sub-dominant of the upper-Tonic (4/3 of the Tonic). This makes for a nice little instrument, with no real dissonances and plenty of strings to pluck, mute or leave open. These three notes are still the foundation notes used by bass players everywhere.
The gap between the sub dominant and dominant notes all have a natural spacing that seems about right, so call it a Wholetone.
Musical Technology marches on.
In particular, halfway between the tonic and the Dominant is a spot just 5/4 higher than the tonic that sounds special. Since it is about midway between the tonic and the dominant, you call it the Mediant. -
Is there a Sub-Mediant? Of course(!), at the 4/5 point below the Tonic, perhaps a bit harder to discern.
However, there a big gap between the tonic and the mediant. Fortunately there's another note you can add to fill it; the dominant of the dominant, this gives you a note between the tonic and the mediant, just above the tonic, the super-tonic. This gives you 3 sets of 3-note chords with a tonic-mediant-dominant structure, such a cool-sounding and useful chord that you call it the major chord. -
There are also three chords with a sub-mediant in them. These later chords have a different sound than the major chords, their sub-mediant note is buried under the Dominant and pushing a bit close to the Tonic, so sounds tight or restricted, so you naturally call them the Minor chords.
There's just one more note to name, the note just under the Tonic. Somehow, despite being created by playing only progressive sequences of notes it somehow has an implied dissonance against the tonic and the listener's ear knows it, even when the tonic is not playing. But this creates a cool musical tension that can make the music interesting. It creates notes that want to be "led back" to the tonic, creating a resolution. So call it the Leading Tone.-
This is instrument enough for several centuries of development of fine music. Enough time so that the notes are given a second set of names: that correspond to the number that they are from the tonic, in roman numerals; Arabic numerals and the concept of zero are still in the future:
I Tonic UnityII Super-Tonic SecondIII Mediant ThirdIV Sub-Dominant FourthV Dominant FifthVI Sub-Mediant SixthVII Leading Tone SeventhVIII (upper-)Tonic Octave
Musical hop-scotch
What about going the other way, going from the Sub-dominant to it's subdominant? This gives you a note a fourth below the Fourth that does not have a name (with one exception none of these fancy new notes has a name) called the Minor Seventh , halfway between the normal "major" Sixth and "major" Seventh. Again this note makes a whole pile of sense in some arrangements. Again, once this game starts you quickly fill in all the notes down to the octave below. and, of course, this gets called the Circle of Fourths.
Every keyboard needs more Mediants
This kind of simple musical arrangement using dominants was all the rage in the 8th and 9th centuries (a good link to Gregorian chant is wanted here, any suggestions?). But over time instruments improved in clarity and arrangers learned how to incorporate the mediant or third, into chords. But there's a wonderful ambiguity about thirds: should they be a major third above the root, or a major third below the Dominant? In the major scale some chords have mediants, the major third, and some are minor chords with a sub-mediant, a minor third in them. In the early days one could imagine a musician deftly retuning his or her instrument's thirds to suit the next song, but as the instruments grew heavier and more strings were added, this became a challenge.
So musician naturally wanted keys added the keyboards, so that every note had a mediant and a submediant.
Invasion of the "accidentals"
Musicial naming theory is an incredibly hoary and old thing. the black notes on the piano were added over 800 years ago, yet still have no real names, only relative names like Minor this or Augmented that, and are called accidentals.
More to come.
Tuning wars: "Just tuning" purists vs the 'good enough" pragmatists. Stay tuned.